Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
Dept . of Geography & Environment
LSE
Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE 
UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 7971
Fax:+44 (0)20 7955 7412 

E-mail:
A.Rodriguez-Pose@lse.ac.uk

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[]

Current research

 

Research in English:

 Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N.  Is there a link between regional disparities and devolution? Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis, London School of Economics, 79, 34 pp, February 2003, ISBN 07530 1624 9.

Abstract: This paper presents an examination of the possible correlation between rising income inequalities at the regional level and widespread devolutionary initiatives worldwide. When the responsibility- and resource-based facets of decentralisation are taken together, a marked congruency is evident between the two trends. While various spatial economic forces promote the emergence of core and peripheral regions, devolution, by establishing their autonomy, allows these forces a greater impact. We argue that this is because decentralisation initiatives carry with them implicit fiscal, political and administrative costs, which fall more heavily upon those regions with limited adjustment capacities, resulting in differential rates at which regions can capitalise upon the opportunities offered by devolution. The global tendency towards devolution therefore reflects a subtle, but profound, renunciation of the traditional equalisation role of national government, in favour of conditions fostering economic and public competition, and leading to greater development of initially rich and powerful regions to the detriment of poorer areas (pdf).

 

 Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Fratesi, U.,  Unbalanced development strategies and the lack of regional convergence in the EU, Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis, London School of Economics, 76, 45 pp, July 2002,  ISBN 0530 1582 X.

Abstract: European regional support has grown in parallel with European integration. The funds targeted at achieving greater economic and social cohesion and reducing disparities within the European Union (EU) have more than doubled in relative terms since the end of the 1980s, making development policies the second most important policy area in the EU. The majority of the development funds have been earmarked for Objective 1 regions, i.e. regions whose GDP per capita is below the 75% threshold of the EU average. However, the European development policies have come under increasing criticism based on two facts: the lack of upward mobility of assisted regions and the absence of regional convergence. This paper assesses, using cross-sectional and panel data analyses, the failure so far of European development policies to deliver greater economic and social cohesion by examining how European Structural Fund support is allocated among different development axes in Objective 1 regions. We find that, despite the concentration of development funds on infrastructure and, to a lesser extent, on business support, the returns to commitments on these axes are not significant. Support to agriculture has short-term positive effects on growth, but these wane quickly, and only investment in education and human capital – which only represents about one eight of the total commitments – has medium-term positive and significant returns (pdf).

 

 Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N., The global trend towards devolution and its implications, Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis, London School of Economics, 72, 41 pp, July 2002.  ISBN 07530 1574 9  

Abstract: Globalisation has been accompanied by an equally global tendency towards devolution of authority and resources from nation-states to regions and localities that takes on various forms, depending upon which actors are driving decentralisation efforts. The existence of a general trend towards devolution also has significant implications for efficiency, equity, and administration. This paper outlines first the general drive towards devolution and proceeds to examine which countries are experiencing which forms of decentralisation. A theoretical argument emphasising the role of governmental legitimacy across various tiers of government is used to explain the diversity of devolution initiatives, drawing on examples, which include Brazil and Mexico, India and China, the US and some European countries. Having supported our model of decentralisation, the paper then examines the implications of the widespread downward transfer of powers towards regions. Some of the less widely discussed pitfalls of decentralisation are presented and caution in promoting devolutionary efforts is the prescription of this paper (pdf).

 Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Sánchez-Reaza, J., Economic polarisation through trade: the impact of trade liberalisation on Mexico's regional growth, 2002

Abstract: The paper analyses the impact trade liberalisation and economic integration have had on regional growth and regional disparities in Mexico over the last two decades. It is highlighted that the passage from an import substitution system to membership of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) first, and to economic integration in the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) later, have led to greater concentration of economic activity and territorial polarisation. The analysis also shows that trade liberalisation and economic integration have profoundly altered the factors associated with regional per capita economic growth. Regional growth in the import substitution period was mainly linked to oil exports, migration and distance to Mexico City. During the GATT period migration was still the main determinant, but oil exports and distance to Mexico City were no longer significant. Finally membership of NAFTA led to a shift in the relevant market from Mexico City to the US and factors such as the endowment of human capital start to become significant (pdf).

 Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Refolo, M.C., The link between clusters of SMEs and public and university research in Italy, 2001.

Abstract: Small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) are increasingly regarded as engines of innovative activity, especially in some of the most dynamic local production systems in Western Europe. However, most SMEs lack the adequate resources to conduct R&D, which is traditionally considered as the main source of innovation. This apparent contradiction has induced several researchers to try to answer the question of where do SMEs get their knowledge inputs from. This literature, which has tended to use patents as a proxy for public research, has found that SMEs are particularly sensitive to spillovers from university and public research. In this paper we readdress this question by using a bibliometric indicator of public research output, instead of patents, for 99 Italian provinces during the 1990s. The results highlight that there is a strong geographical connection between the territorial concentration of SMEs and public research and that this connection is affected by firm size (pdf).

 Rodríguez-Pose, A, Socio-political structure and economic growth in the OECD, 2000.

Abstract: Despite the fact that recent literature on socio-economic restructuring has tended to highlight the close connection between economic growth and social and political factors, most cross-national empirical growth research has faced serious difficulties when introducing noneconomic variables in growth models. Many social, political, and institutional variables in growth models are considered to be non robust when extreme-bounds tests are applied, since they do not stand small changes in the set of conditioning variables. This paper suggests that this lack of robustness may be more linked to problems of modelling social and political variables, and to the number of omitted variables, the strong emphasis on linearity, and the problems of reverse causation common to empirical growth models, than to a real lack of connection between growth and local socio-political structures. The empirical section tackles the connection between growth and social and political structures in the OECD between 1960 and 1994, using cluster analysis as an alternative method. The results highlight a strong association between national growth patterns in the last three and a half decades and nation-specific sets of social and political variables, which would have been difficult to unveil using linear regression models (pdf).

 

Last updated 10/01/2006