John Pemberton`s homepage
John Pemberton is an Associate at the Centre for Philosophy of the Natural and Social Sciences at the LSE (since 1994), a Research Associate on the Powers Structuralism project at Corpus Christi in Oxford, and an Associate of the Centre for Humanities Engaging Science and Society (CHESS) at Durham University.
My current research is focused on developing a power-process ontology: The world exhibits surviving processes (power-processes) which are physical (i.e. spatially located) and ground Aristotelian powers - many such processes are typically taken to be things. At each stage, a power-process is (generally) the acting together of its parts (sub-processes) to bring about the next stage of the process, where ‘acting together’ is having mutually activated Aristotelian (agent-patient) powers.
This recent research has developed out of long-standing work with Nancy Cartwright focused on nomological machines (causation, powers, and laws of nature) which continues as a major strand of my research. Nomological machines are configurations of features with powers which give rise to change processes and hence regularities which we record as laws (here we remain agnostic on the nature of the features which ground powers). My development towards a process view is strongly influenced by Aristotle's ontology of change and his account of the form-matter hylomorphism (as explicated by Anna Marmodoro).
Process, powers, change, causation, configuration, arrangement, laws.
I have recently made the following presentations on topics associated with power-processes and am busy drafting the related papers:
Possibilities from powers presented at the Real possibilities, determinism and free will conference in Konstanz 18-21 March 2015.
Joint papers with Nancy Cartwright:
Ceteris paribus laws need machines to generate them (2014). Pemberton & Cartwright. Erkenntnis special issue: Semantics and pragmatics of ceteris paribus conditions.
Aristotelian powers: without them, what would modern science do? (2013). Cartwright & Pemberton. In Powers and capacities in philosophy: the new Aristotelianism. Edited by J. Greco and R. Groff. Routledge.
Slides from a recent presentation jointly authored with Nancy Cartwright: Science powers: how Aristotelian are they?
Here is a podcast of a recent presentation to the Powers Structuralism project:
Other recent papers:
Previous papers linking to work in finance and economics:
Why ideals in economics have limited use in Idealization XII: Correcting the model, idealization and abstraction in the sciences. Edited by Martin Jones and Nancy Cartwright. Poznan Studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities.
The methodology of actuarial science. British Actuarial Journal, volume 5, part I, no. 21. April 1999.