DQ1. Avicenna gives an argument with the conclusion, 'A necessary being exists.'
(a) Is this conclusion enough to establish that God exists?
(b) Try to reconstruct Avicenna's argument as a valid argument in premise-conclusion form. Is it a good argument?
DQ2. Here is Craig's argument that the universe's beginning has a cause.
Why believe the second premise? Why believe the first premise? Is this a good argument for the existence of God?
(Optional) DQ3. What does it mean to say that the universe is 'finely tuned'? Is this a good reason to think that the universe has a creator?