IHPST/SPHere
These slides: personal.lse.ac.uk/robert49/talks/paris
Paper: arxiv:2503.08753
Join: philosophyofphysics.org
Thermodynamics is successful but seems to be strictly false.
Reduction: Claim thermodynamics is about statistical averages.
(BWR 2023: 'Unionist' party)
Despair: Reject that thermodynamics is true at fundamental levels.
(BWR 2023: 'Home-rule' approach)
Shared Structure: Thermodynamics and mechanics retain some autonomy but also happen to agree because of their shared structure.
(BWR 2023: 'European' approach)
What is the shared structure?
Thermodynamics is identical to mechanics
when some energy, which we call 'heat', unobservable.
The world is a Lorentzian manifold \((M,g_{ab})\)
The world is a Hilbert space \((H,\mathcal{A})\)
The world is a vector bundle with a connection \((V,\nabla)\)
"There is a semi-permeable membrane in contact with a heat bath."
????
"Every mathematician knows it is impossible to understand an elementary course in thermodynamics. ...The reason is that the thermodynamics is based — as Gibbs has explicitly proclaimed — on a rather complicated mathematical theory, on the contact geometry." Arnol'd (1990, p.163) → cf. Uffink 2001, p.310)
The world is a mechanical system with some observables, \((M,\omega,S)\)
and where some of the energy is unobservable.
\(dh = PdV\)
\(dh = PdV \, + \,?\)
\(dh = PdV + \xi\)
\(\xi = \) the heat one form (\(= \text{đ}Q\))
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Energy
\(\rho = -p_1dq_1 - p_2dq_2 - p_3dq_3 - p_4dq_4 - p_5dq_5 - \cdots - p_{10^{23}}dq_{10^{23}}\)
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Energy
\(\rho = -p_1dq_1 - p_2dq_2 - p_3dq_3 - p_4dq_4 - p_5dq_5 - \cdots - p_{10^{23}}dq_{10^{23}}\)
Measurement procedures
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Energy
\(\rho = -\)\(\underbrace{PdV}_{\text{measurable}}\)\( - \underbrace{p_2dq_2 - p_3dq_3 - p_4dq_4 - p_5dq_5 - \cdots - p_{10^{23}}dq_{10^{23}}}_{\text{non-measurable}}\)
Measurement procedures
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Energy
\(dU = -\)\(\underbrace{\omega}_{PdV}\)\( - \underbrace{p_2dq_2 - p_3dq_3 - p_4dq_4 - p_5dq_5 - \cdots - p_{10^{23}}dq_{10^{23}}}_{\text{non-measurable}}\)
Measurement procedures
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Energy
\(dU = -\)\(\underbrace{\omega}_{PdV}\)\( + \underbrace{\xi}_{TdS}\)
Measurement procedures
Phase space: \((T^*C,\Omega)\)
Energy
\(dU = -\)\(\underbrace{\omega}_{PdV}\)\( + \underbrace{\xi}_{TdS}\)
\(\xi\) \(= dU +\) \(\omega\)
"Decomposition of energy into observable vs. hidden parts"
\(\xi\) \(= dU +\) \(\omega\)
"Decomposition of energy into observable vs. hidden parts"
Some special cases:
Some more technical material
Some more technical material
Mechanical state space
\(dU = -\)\(\underbrace{\omega}_{PdV}\)\( - \underbrace{p_2dq_2 - p_3dq_3 - p_4dq_4 - p_5dq_5 - \cdots - p_{10^{23}}dq_{10^{23}}}_{\text{non-measurable}}\)
Thermodynamics
\(dU +\) \(\omega\) \(=\) \(\xi\) \(= TdS\)
Answer: The reduction of many hidden degrees of freedom to just one called entropy \(S\), with temperature \(T\) its conjugate.
\(\xi\) \(= dU +\) \(\omega\)
'Reduction' of a dynamical system \((T^*C,\Omega)\) to a contact system \((M,\theta,L)\)
'Reduction' of a dynamical system \((T^*C,\Omega)\) to a contact system \((M,\theta,L)\)
'Reduction' of a dynamical system \((T^*C,\Omega)\) to a contact system \((M,\theta,L)\)
'Reduction' of a dynamical system \((T^*C,\Omega)\) to a contact system \((M,\theta,L)\)
Contact geometry is the deep structure of thermodynamics:
Reduction Procedure: BWR 2025
Nagel (1949): "acute intellectual discomfort is often experienced"
Nagel (1961): an "acute sense of mystification that is thereby engendered"
Uffink (2001): Reversibility is "the most profound problem in the foundations of thermal and statistical physics"
Valente (2021): "Such issues undermine a reductive explanation of thermo-dynamical phenomena"
Clausius Entropy Argument: if a function \(T\) and a curve \(\gamma\) from \(p_i\) to \(p_f\) satisfy certain assumptions...
...then \(S(p_i) \leq S(p_f)\).
Loophole: No time asymmetry if \(S(p_i)=S(p_f)\).
Claim: if \(S(p_i) \neq S(p_f)\), then energy conservation is violated.
Claim: if \(S(p_i) \neq S(p_f)\), then energy conservation is violated.
Summary. If Clausius entropy increases, then energy conservation is violated.
Summary. If Clausius entropy increases, then energy conservation is violated.
The arrows of thermodynamics and mechanics align.
Shared Structure: Thermodynamics and mechanics retain some autonomy but also happen to agree because of their shared structure.
(BWR 2023: 'European' approach)
What is the shared structure?
Thermodynamics is identical to mechanics
when some energy, which we call 'heat', unobservable.
Theorem. Let \(\pi:L\rightarrow N\) be a line bundle, \(U\) a vertical coordinate function, and \(\omega = \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}P_i dV_i\) a one-form on \(L\) with \(V_i\) coordinates in \(N\), so \(\ker\pi_*\subseteq\ker\omega\). Let \(\xi := dU + \omega\) be nowhere-vanishing. If,
(Energy conservation for work-closed adiabats): for every piecewise-smooth \(\gamma\) in \(L\), if \(\pi[\gamma]\) is closed and \(\xi(\bar{\gamma})=0\), then \(\int_\gamma\omega=0\),
then \(\xi = TdS\) for some smooth \(T,S\) in a neighbourhood of each \(p\in L\).
Slides created using reveal.js.