Complete list of papers
In progress |
The
impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation (with
F. Dietrich)
The
first-personal argument against physicalism
|
2024 |
A quadrilemma for theories of consciousness, Philosophical
Quarterly, online early, 2024
Probabilistically coherent credences despite opacity, Economics
and Philosophy, online early, 2024
Levels of Description and Levels of Reality, in A. Wilson and K.
Robertson (eds.), Levels of Explanation, OUP, forthcoming
Dynamically rational judgment aggregation (with F. Dietrich),
Social Choice and Welfare, online early, 2023
Mechanical Choices: A Compatibilist Libertarian Response,
Criminal Law and Philosophy 18: 109-131, 2024
|
2023 |
Agential Possibilities, Possibility Studies and Society 1(4):
399-513, 2023
Do group agents have free will?, Inquiry, online early, 2023
The many-worlds theory of consciousness,
Nous 57(2): 316-340, 2023
|
2022 |
The naturalistic
case for free will, in S. Ioannidis et al. (eds.), Levels of
Reality in Science and Philosophy, Springer, 2022
Special Science
Counterfactuals, The Monist 105(2): 194-213, 2022
Group Responsibility, Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility,
2022
|
2021 |
Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and
Technology 34: 1213-1242, 2021
Dynamic and stochastic systems as a framework for metaphysics and
the philosophy of science (with M. Pivato), Synthese 198(3):
2551-2612, 2021
|
2020 |
The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general
impossibility theorem (with F. Dietrich), invited contribution
to a CUP volume on Lotteries, Knowledge, and Rational Belief, edited by Igor Douven,
2020
What normative facts should political theory be about? Philosophy of
science meets political liberalism (with L. Valentini), Oxford
Studies in Political Philosophy 6: 185-220, 2020
Free will: real or illusion? (A debate with G. D. Caruso and C.
J. Clark) The Philosopher 108(1), 2020 |
2019 |
Levels: descriptive, explanatory, and ontological,
Nous
53(4): 852-883
What's wrong with the consequence argument: In
defence of compatibilist libertarianism,
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119(3):
253-274
|
2018 |
Democratic Deliberation and Social Choice: A Review, Oxford
Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
From Degrees of Belief to Binary Beliefs: Lessons from
Judgment-Aggregation Theory (with
F. Dietrich), Journal of Philosophy 115(5):
225-270
What is it like to be a group agent?
Nous 52(2): 295-319
|
2017 |
What matters and how it matters: A
choice-theoretic representation of moral
theories (with F. Dietrich), The
Philosophical Review 126(4): 421-479
Probabilistic Opinion Pooling Generalized
-- Part One: General Agendas (with F.
Dietrich), Social Choice and Welfare 48(4):
747-786
Probabilistic
Opinion Pooling Generalized -- Part Two: The Premise-based Approach
(with F. Dietrich), Social
Choice and Welfare 48(4): 787-814
Does the exclusion argument put any pressure on
dualism? (with D. Stoljar), Australasian
Journal of Philosophy 95(1): 96-108 [preprint
|
official journal link]
My brain made me do it: The exclusion argument against free will, and
what’s wrong with it (with P. Menzies), in
H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, and H. Price (eds.),
Making a Difference, Oxford (Oxford University Press), 2017 |
2016 |
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An
explanatory framework (with F. Dietrich),
Economics and Philosophy 32(2): 175-229
Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a
philosophy-of-science perspective
(with F. Dietrich), Economics and Philosophy
32(2): 249-281
Freedom as independence (with
L. Valentini), Ethics 126(4): 1043-1074
Belief revision
generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes's
and Jeffrey's rules (with F. Dietrich and R.
Bradley), Journal of Economic Theory
162: 352-371 (click
here for earlier version with additional results)
The Condorcet jury theorem and voter-specific
truth (with K. Spiekermann), in H. Kornblith
and B. McLaughlin (eds.), Alvin Goldman and his
Critics, Oxford (Blackwell), 2016
The Methodology of Political Theory (with L. Valentini),
Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology,
2016
Probabilistic opinion pooling [an
introductory review] (with F. Dietrich), Oxford
Handbook of Probability and Philosophy, 2016
Engineering Moral Machines (with M. Fisher,
M. Slavkovik, and A. Winfield), Informatik
Spektrum 39(6): 467-472
|
2015 |
Emergent Chance (with M. Pivato),
The Philosophical Review 124(1): 119-152 |
2014 |
When
to defer to supermajority testimony -- and when not, in J. Lackey
(ed.), Essays in Collective Epistemology, Oxford
(Oxford University Press)
Two Intuitions about Free Will: Alternative
Possibilities and Intentional Endorsement (with W.
Rabinowicz), Philosophical Perspectives 28:
155-172
Three kinds of collective attitudes,
Erkenntnis 79(9,Suppl.): 1601-1622
Aggregating
Causal Judgements
(with R. Bradley and F. Dietrich), Philosophy of Science 81: 491-515
Free Will, Determinism, and the Possibility of
Doing Otherwise,
Nous 48(1): 156-178
Independence and Interdependence: Lessons from
the Hive
(with A.
Vermeule), Rationality and Society
26: 170-207
|
2013 |
Social Choice Theory, Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy, Winter 2013 Edition
Methodological Individualism and Holism in
Political Science: A Reconciliation (with K.
Spiekermann), American Political Science Review
107(4): 629-643
Swarm intelligence: When uncertainty meets
conflict (with L. Conradt and T. J. Roper),
American Naturalist 182(5): 592-610
Where do preferences come from? A summary
(with F. Dietrich), Proceedings of the
International Conference on Logic Across the
University: Foundations and Applications
(Beijing, China)
=> Our response in
these Proceedings to replies to our paper:
A response to Baltag, Girard, and White
A
reason-based theory of rational choice (with F. Dietrich),
Nous 47(1): 104-134, 2013
Deliberation,
Single-Peakedness, and the Possibility of Meaningful Democracy:
Evidence from Deliberative Polls (with R. C. Luskin, J. S. Fishkin
and I. McLean), Journal of Politics 75(1): 80-95
Where do preferences come from?
(with F. Dietrich), International
Journal of Game Theory 42(3): 613-637
Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian
epistemology (with F. Dietrich), Synthese
19(5): 787-808
Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
(with F. Dietrich), Social Choice and
Welfare 40(4): 1067-1095 |
2012 |
Episteme Symposium on Group Agency: Replies to
Gaus, Cariani, Sylvan, and Briggs (with P.
Pettit), Episteme 9(3): 293-309
The theory of judgment aggregation: An
introductory review, Synthese 187(1):
179-207
Collective wisdom: a judgment aggregation perspective, in Helene Landemore and Jon Elster (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Principles and
Mechanisms, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press)
Judgment aggregation: a short introduction,
in U. Maki (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics,
Amsterdam (Elsevier) |
2011 |
The Logical Space of Democracy, Philosophy
and Public Affairs 39(3): 262-297
A Model of Non-informational Preference Change
(with Franz
Dietrich), Journal of Theoretical Politics
23(2): 145-164
Group
Communication and the Transformation of
Judgments: An Impossibility Result,
Journal of Political Philosophy 19(1): 1-27 |
2010 |
The Causal Autonomy of the Special Sciences
(with Peter Menzies), in C. Mcdonald and G. Mcdonald (eds.),
Emergence in Mind, Oxford (Oxford University Press)
Disaggregating
Deliberation's Effects: An Experiment within a Deliberative Poll (with Cynthia Farrar, James Fishkin, Donald Green, Robert Luskin and
Elizabeth Levy Paluck), British Journal of Political Science 40(2):
333-347
The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory
(with Franz
Dietrich), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3
Introduction to judgment aggregation
(with Ben Polak), Journal of Economic Theory
145(2): 441-466
Majority voting on restricted domains
(with Franz Dietrich), Journal of Economic Theory 145(2): 512-543
The
impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation (with Franz Dietrich), Theory and Decision 68(3): 281-299
Can there be a global demos? An agency-based
approach (with Mathias Koenig-Archibugi),
Philosophy and Public Affairs 38(1): 76-110 |
2009 |
Non-Reductive Physicalism and the Limits of
the Exclusion Principle (with Peter
Menzies), Journal of Philosophy
CVI(9): 475-502
Independence and interdependence in collective decision making: an
agent-based model of nest-site choice by honeybee swarms (with
Christian Elsholtz and Thomas D Seeley), Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B 364: 755-762
Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey (with Larissa
Conradt), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364:
719-742
Judgment aggregation: a survey (with Clemens Puppe), in P. Anand,
C. Puppe and P. Pattanaik (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Rational and
Social Choice, Oxford (Oxford University Press)
Desire-as-belief revisited (with Richard Bradley), Analysis
69(1): 31-37 |
2008 |
Judgment aggregation under constraints
(with Franz Dietrich), in T. Boylan and
R. Gekker (eds.), Economics, Rational Choice and Normative
Philosophy, London (Routledge)
A
liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
(with Franz Dietrich), Social Choice and Welfare 31: 59-78
Judgment
aggregation without full rationality
(with Franz Dietrich), Social Choice and Welfare 31: 15-39
Deliberation
and Agreement, in Shawn W. Rosenberg (ed.), Can the People
Govern? Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, Basingstoke
(Palgrave Macmillan)
Which
worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem, Journal of
Philosophical Logic 37: 57-65
Distributed
Cognition: A Perspective from Social Choice Theory,
in M. Albert, D. Schmidtchen and S. Voigt (eds.), Scientific
Competition: Theory and Policy, Conferences on New Political Economy
vol. 24, Tuebingen (Mohr Siebeck) |
2007 |
Strategy-proof
judgment aggregation (with Franz Dietrich), Economics and
Philosophy 23(3): 269-300
Judgment
aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized
(with Franz Dietrich), Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(4):
391-424
Arrow's
theorem in judgment aggregation
(with Franz Dietrich), Social Choice and Welfare
29(1): 19-33 |
2006 |
A
Conditional Defense of Plurality Rule: Generalizing May's Theorem in a
Restricted Informational Environment (with Robert E. Goodin),
American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 940-949
Group
Agency and Supervenience (with Philip Pettit), Southern Journal of
Philosophy XLIV (Spindel Supplement): 85-105; reprinted in J. Hohwy
and J. Kallestrup (eds.), Being Reduced, Oxford (Oxford University
Press), 2008
Republican
Freedom and the Rule of Law,
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5(2): 201-220
Special
Majorities Rationalized (with
Robert E. Goodin),
British Journal of Political Science 36(2): 213-241
The
Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason,
Ethics 116(2): 362-402
|
2005
|
Group
knowledge and group rationality: a judgment aggregation perspective,
Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 2(1): 25-38
On
the Many as One
(with
Philip Pettit), Philosophy and
Public Affairs 33(4): 377-390 (© 2005 Blackwell Publishing, Inc.)
The
Two-Envelope Paradox: An Axiomatic Approach (with
Franz Dietrich),
Mind 114(454):
239-248
The
Probability of Inconsistencies in Complex Collective Decisions,
Social Choice and Welfare 24(1): 3-32
A
Simple Proof of Sen's Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions (with
Christian Elsholtz),
Elemente der Mathematik 60: 45-56 |
2004
|
An
Epistemic Free Riding Problem? (with
Philip Pettit) In Philip
Catton and Graham Macdonald (eds.), Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals, London (Routledge)
Framing
as Path-Dependence (with
Natalie Gold),
Economics and Philosophy 20(2): 253-277
A
model of jury decisions where all jurors have the same evidence
(with
Franz Dietrich),
Synthese
(section on Knowledge, Rationality and Action) 142: 175-202
Social
Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Response to Aldred (with
John Dryzek),
British Journal of Political Science 34(4):
752-758
On
the Significance of the Absolute Margin,
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 521-544
A
Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions,
American Political Science Review
98(3):
495-513
Deliberative
Polling als Methode zum Erlernen des demokratischen Sprechens
(with
Anne Sliwka),
Zeitschrift fuer
Politik 51(1):
87-105
(English
translation)
Aggregating
Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared (with
Philip Pettit),
Synthese
140(1-2): 207-235
The
Impossibility of a Paretian Republican: Some Comments on Pettit and Sen,
Economics and Philosophy
20(1): 1-23
Democracy
in animal groups: a political science perspective,
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19(4): 168-169
Multidimensional
Welfare Aggregation,
Public Choice 119: 119-142
|
2003
|
The Voting Power Approach: A Theory of Measurement,
European Union Politics 4(4): 487-497
Are
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility Indeterminate,
Erkenntnis
58: 229-260
A
Possibility Theorem on Aggregation over Multiple Interconnected Propositions,
Mathematical Social Sciences 45(1):
1-13 (important
correction)
Social
Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation (with
John Dryzek),
British Journal of Political Science 33(1): 1-28
|
2002
|
Intradimensional
Single-Peakedness and the Multidimensional Arrow Problem,
Theory and Decision 52(3): 287-301
Two
Concepts of Agreement,
The Good Society 11(1): 72-79; reprinted in a modified
and extended form as "Substantive and Meta-Agreement", in A.
van Aaken, C. List and C. Luetge (2003), Deliberation and Decision, Aldershot (Ashgate)
Aggregating
Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
(with
Philip Pettit),
Economics and Philosophy 18: 89-110
|
2001
|
Epistemic
Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem (with
Robert E. Goodin),
Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3): 277-306
Some
Remarks on the Probability of Cycles,
Appendix to "Epistemic Democracy"
A
Note on Introducing a 'Zero-Line' of Welfare as an Escape-Route from Arrow's
Theorem, Pacific
Economic Review 6(2) (special section in
honour of Amartya Sen): 223-238
Optimality Theory and the Problem of Constraint Aggregation (with
Daniel Harbour) (abstract)
The
Linguistics/Philosophy Interface, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics and
Philosophy 1
|
1999
|
Craig's
Theorem and the Empirical Underdetermination Thesis Reassessed,
Disputatio
7: 28-39
|
1998
|
Indeterminacy
of Translation Reassessed: Is the Problem of Translation an Empirical
Matter? Philosophical Writings 9: 23-38
|
Book
review |
Review
of Maurizio Passerin d'Entreves (ed.), Democracy
as Public Deliberation: new perspectives, Political
Studies Review 2003
|
Dissertation |
Mission
Impossible? The Problem of Democratic Aggregation in the Face of Arrow's
Theorem, DPhil-thesis in Politics, University of Oxford, submitted April
2001, examined July 2001
|
Older working papers
|
Judgment
aggregation with consistency alone
(with F. Dietrich) (older paper)
Opinion pooling on general agendas
(with Franz Dietrich), superseded by "Probabilistic Opinion Pooling
Generalized: Parts One and Two"
The
Epistemology of Special Majority Voting, 2003
(web-based institutional working
paper)
A Note on Measuring Preference Structuration, Nuffield College Working
Paper in Economics
2000-W8
(web-based institutional working paper)
Multidimensional Inequality Measurement: A Proposal, Nuffield College
Working Paper in Economics 1999-W27 |
|