|


| LSE
Economics |
| CV |
| Publications |
| Working Papers|
| Teaching|
| Miscellaneous|
|
|
Johannes Spinnewijn
Position: Lecturer
(Assistant Professor) in Economics
Research
Interests:
Public Economics, Contract Theory, Behavioral
Economics
Contact details:
Other affiliations:
- Capital Income Taxes with Heterogeneous Discount
Rates (with Peter
Diamond) - AEJ: Economic Policy 3(4), November 2011
Abstract: With heterogeneity in both skills and discount factors,
the Atkinson-Stiglitz theorem that savings
should not be taxed does not hold. In a model with heterogeneity of
preferences at each earnings level, introducing a savings tax on high
earners or a savings subsidy on low earners increases welfare,
regardless of the correlation between ability and discount factor.
Extending Saez (2002), a uniform savings tax
increases welfare if that correlation is sufficiently high. Key for the
results is that types who value future consumption less are more tempted
by a lower paid job. Some optimal tax results and empirical evidence are
presented.
- Solutions
Manual to Accompany Contract Theory (with Arthur Campbell, Moshe
Cohen and Florian Ederer)
The MIT Press (September 30, 2007), 144 pages
- Heterogeneity,
Demand for Insurance and Adverse Selection (Web Appendix) - NEW
Abstract: Recent empirical work finds that surprisingly little
variation in the demand for insurance is explained by heterogeneity in risks.
I distinguish between heterogeneity in risk preferences and risk perceptions
underlying the unexplained variation. Heterogeneous risk perceptions induce a
systematic difference between the revealed and actual value of insurance as a
function of the insurance price. Using a sufficient statistics approach that
accounts for this alternative source of heterogeneity, I find that the
welfare conclusions regarding adversely selected markets are substantially
different. The source of heterogeneity is also essential for the evaluation
of different interventions intended to correct inefficiencies due to adverse
selection like insurance subsidies and mandates, risk-adjusted pricing and
information policies.
- Information Search and Disclosure in Groups
(with Arthur Campbell and Florian Ederer) - Submitted
Abstract: We analyze costly information
acquisition and information revelation in groups in a dynamic setting.
Even when group members have perfectly aligned interests the group may
inefficiently delay decisions. When deadlines are far away, uninformed
group members freeride on each
others' efforts to acquire information. When deadlines draw
close, informed group members stop revealing their information in an
attempt to incentivize other group members to continue searching for
information. Surprisingly, setting a tighter deadline may increase the
expected decision time and increase the expected accuracy of the
decision in the unique equilibrium. As long as the deadline is set
optimally, welfare is higher when information is only privately
observable to the agent who obtained information rather than to the
entire group.
- Unemployed but Optimistic: Optimal Insurance
Design with Biased Beliefs - Submitted
Abstract: This paper analyzes how job
seekers' biased perceptions about their employment prospects affect the
optimal design of unemployment insurance. Biased perceptions change the
perceived value of insurance and the perceived return to search efforts.
Policies implementing standard "sufficient-statistics" formula
become sub-optimal and a wedge arises between social and private insurance.
A paternalistic social planner corrects for the implied search
distortions, while private insurers respond to the misperceived value of
insurance. Empirically, I find that unemployed job seekers greatly
overestimate how quickly they will find work. As a consequence,
privatizing unemployment insurance results in too low or rapidly
decreasing unemployment benefits.
- Insurance and Perceptions: How to Screen Optimists
and Pessimists - Submitted
Abstract: People have very different beliefs about the risks they face, even when these risks are identical. I analyze how heterogeneous risk perceptions affect the insurance contracts offered by profit-maximizing firms. An essential distinction is how risk perceptions affect the willingness to pay for insurance relative to the willingness to exert risk-reducing effort. This determines both the sign of the correlation between risk and insurance coverage in equilibrium, shedding new light on a recent empirical puzzle, and the type of individuals screened by either monopolistic or competing firms. Even with perfect competition, heterogeneous risk perceptions may well strengthen the case for government intervention in insurance markets.
- Training and Search During Unemployment -
Submitted
Abstract: Displaced workers often experience large losses in
earnings, even a long time after reemployment. Training programs during
unemployment mitigate these losses but also affect the unemployed's willingness to search. This paper analyzes how mandatory training programs affect the
optimal design of unemployment insurance and how the training intensity
should evolve during the unemployment spell. I find that the optimal
path of unemployment consumption may be reversed when introducing
training programs and that even the long-term unemployed should be
incentivized to find employment despite the depreciation of human
capital during unemployment. Targeting training programs towards the
long-term unemployed is optimal only if the fall in human capital upon
displacement is small relative to the depreciation during unemployment.
- Revising Claims and Resisting Ultimatums in
Bargaining Games (with Frans Spinnewyn) -
Submitted
Abstract: We propose a mechanism which implements a unique
solution to the bargaining problem with two players in subgame-perfect equilibrium. Players start by making
claims and accept a compromise only if they cannot gain by pursuing
their claim in an ultimatum. The player offering the lowest resistance
to his opponent's claim can propose a compromise. The unique solution
depends on the extent to which claims can be revised. If no revisions
are allowed, compatible claims implement the Nash solution. If all
revisions are allowed, maximal claims implement the Kalai-Smorodinsky
solution.
- Public
Economics (graduate, LSE course, ec534)
- Contract
Economics (undergraduate, LSE course, ec301)
- Introductory
Microeconomics (summer, LSE course, ec101)
- "Hard
cash or a secure job - which is better?" featured in Financial
Times (February 7, 2009) (link)
- "The
Role of Commitment" comment on "On the interaction between
subsidiarity and interpersonal solidarity" by Jacques Dreze (link)
|